首页> 外文OA文献 >Extracorporeal shock waves stimulate frog sciatic nerves indirectly via a cavitation-mediated mechanism.
【2h】

Extracorporeal shock waves stimulate frog sciatic nerves indirectly via a cavitation-mediated mechanism.

机译:体外冲击波通过空化介导的机制间接刺激青蛙坐骨神经。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Shock waves (SWs) are single pressure pulses with amplitudes up to over 100 MPa, a rise time of only a few nanoseconds, and a short duration of approximately 2 microseconds. Their clinical application for stone destruction causes pain, indicating nerve stimulation by SWs. To examine this phenomenon, sciatic nerves of frogs were exposed to SWs in an organ bath. The SWs were generated with an experimental Dornier lithotripter model XL1 at an operating voltage of 15 kV. The nerves were mounted in a chamber which allowed electrical nerve stimulation and the registration of electrically and SW-induced compound action potentials (SWCAPs). The chamber was filled with frog Ringer's solution. In a standardized protocol. The first experiment established that 95.0 +/- 4.7% of administered SWs induced action potentials which were lower in amplitude (1.45 +/- 1.14 versus 1.95 +/- 0.95 mV, p = 0.004) but similar in shape to electrically induced compound action potentials. In a second experiment, it was shown that the site of origin of the SWCAPs could be correctly determined by simultaneous recording of action potentials at both ends of the nerve. The mechanism of shock wave stimulation was examined by experiments 3 and 4. In experiment 3, in contrast to the previous experiments, SW exposure of the nerves was performed 6 cm outside the shock wave focus. This resulted in a mean probability of inducing a SWCAP of only 4%. After gas bubble administration, this probability increased to 86% for the first SW released immediately after bubble application and declined to 56% for the second, 21% for the third, to 0 for the 10th SW after fluid injection. This indicates that cavitation, the interaction between shock waves and gas bubbles in fluid or tissues, was involved in SWCAP generation. In experiment 4, nerves were again exposed in the focus, however, the Ringer's solution surrounding the nerve was replaced by polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). PVA is a solution with low cavitation activity.In PVA, the excitability was markedly diminished to 11.0 +/- 5.1% compared with 96.0 +/- 4.4% in control nerves exposed in Ringer's solution. In conclusion, bioeffects of SWs on nervous tissue appear to result from cavitation. It is suggested that cavitation is also the underlying mechanism of SW-related pain during extracorporeal SW lithotripsy in clinical medicine.
机译:冲击波(SW)是单个压力脉冲,其幅度高达100 MPa以上,上升时间仅为几纳秒,持续时间约为2微秒。它们在结石破坏方面的临床应用会引起疼痛,表明SW刺激了神经。为了检查这种现象,将青蛙的坐骨神经在器官浴中暴露于SW。用实验的Dornier碎石机型号XL1在15 kV的工作电压下生成SW。将神经安装在允许电神经刺激以及电和SW诱发的复合动作电位(SWCAP)记录的腔室内。室内充满了青蛙林格氏液。在标准化协议中。第一个实验建立了95.0 +/- 4.7%的SW诱发的动作电位,振幅较低(1.45 +/- 1.14与1.95 +/- 0.95 mV,p = 0.004),但形状类似于电诱发的复合动作电位。在第二个实验中,表明可以通过同时记录神经两端的动作电位来正确确定SWCAP的起源位置。实验3和4检查了冲击波刺激的机理。在实验3中,与之前的实验相反,神经的SW暴露是在冲击波焦点外6 cm处进行的。这导致产生SWCAP的平均概率仅为4%。气泡管理后,在注入气泡后立即释放的第一个SW的可能性增加到86%,第二次下降到56%,第三次下降到21%,第十次注入流体后下降到0。这表明空化,即冲击波与流体或组织中气泡之间的相互作用,参与了SWCAP的产生。在实验4中,神经再次暴露在焦点处,但是,神经周围的林格氏液被聚乙烯醇(PVA)代替。 PVA是一种低空化活性的溶液,在PVA中,与在林格氏液中暴露的对照神经的兴奋性相比,其兴奋性显着降低至11.0 +/- 5.1%。总之,SW对神经组织的生物效应似乎是由空化引起的。提示空化也是临床医学中体外SW碎石术中SW相关疼痛的潜在机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号